This weekend's Sunday Star had an article from the University of Toronto that articulated how University Professors face a new tide of student dishonesty.
Here are a few of the "cheating horror stories" at U of T:
- A tutorial assistant charged three students $1500 each to slip them the answer sheet when he escorted them to the washroom during the exam. Ruling: Suspended for five years
- A student plagiarized an essay, then forged a doctor's letter saying he was too sick to hand in a second essay on time. He then plagiarized it and handed it in late, followed by a third plagiarized essay. Ruling: Recommended for expulsion
- A student submitted an essay written originally by a professor at Purdue University whose name, sadly, she failed to include in her essay bibliography. Ruling: Suspended for two years
The 2010 Growing Success document on Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting in Ontario Schools seems to have mildly shifted the pendulum back to where teachers can consider assigning late marks and zeros. CtK has had a detailed policy for handling assessments that have not been handed in as per the deadline. Teachers that follow the policy have been allotting zeros if a student fails to complete the assessment piece through this process. In light of this new document, our team will be getting together to re-look at our policy to consider assigning late marks for pieces handed in late. Once the policy has been approved by our administration, we will post it on our public website at http://www.ctk.ca/.
Looking forward to your comments. See you all at Curriculum Night this Wednesday at 6:30 pm.
Any thoughts on using "turn-it-in"? Its quite often at the post-secondary level.
ReplyDelete